[S2M-3012.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 23 Jun 2005 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-3012.1
The description in the bulletin on 2005-06-23 is:
* S2M-3012.1 Mr Kenny MacAskill:Legal Aid Reform—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3012) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from “welcomes” to end and insert “notes with concern current difficulties in the funding, staffing and resourcing of a variety of legal services through a multiplicity of agencies, professions and services; believes that the provision of legal and advice services requires a fundamental review in order for it to meet the new challenges and needs of the 21 st century, and calls for a commission to be established with a wide remit, predicated on the principle that access to justice for all is paramount, to consider and advise on the best method of delivering such access and the best use of available resources within the judiciary, legal profession and the public and voluntary sectors.”
You can search for this motion (S2M-3012.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S2M-3012.1, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3012, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on legal aid reform, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 93.9% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 77 | 36 | 0 | 88.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote