[S2M-3329] Decision Time — 28 Sep 2005 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-3329
The description in the bulletin on 2005-09-22 is:
*S2M-3329 Tricia Marwick on behalf of the Waverley Railway Bill (Scotland) Committee: Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill - Preliminary Stage—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the Bill should proceed as a Private Bill. Supported by: Gordon Jackson*
The description in the bulletin on 2005-09-26 is:
S2M-3329 Tricia Marwick on behalf of the Waverley Railway Bill (Scotland) Committee: Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill - Preliminary Stage—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the Bill should proceed as a Private Bill. Supported by: Gordon Jackson
You can search for this motion (S2M-3329) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-3329, in the name of Tricia Marwick, that the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the bill should proceed as a private bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Lab | 38 | 0 | 1 | 79.6% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 20 | 0 | 0 | 80.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Total: | 102 | 0 | 1 | 81.1% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote