[S2M-3411.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 26 Oct 2005 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S2M-3411.2
The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-26 is:
*S2M-3411.2 Mr Brian Monteith: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3411) in the name of Mr Duncan McNeil, insert at end “with the addition, subject to committee approval of the statement of reasons that further consultation is not necessary and once a successful proposal is lodged, of the Local Government Elections (Scotland) Bill, given that it received 26 signatures of support when previously lodged, is time-sensitive and would be a small piece of legislation requiring only three sections and one member of staff to assist with its progress.” Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-3411.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
In that case, I have to put the question. The first question is, that amendment S2M-3411.2, in the name of Brian Monteith, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3411, in the name of Duncan McNeil, on a report on the prioritisation of the non-Executive bills unit's workload, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 0 | 15 | 83.3% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 8 | 7 | 6 | 84.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 80 | 11 | 21 | 87.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote