[S2M-3411] Decision Time — 26 Oct 2005 at 17:03

This looks like the vote on S2M-3411

The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-17 is:

*S2M-3411 Mr Duncan McNeil: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload—That the Parliament endorses the prioritisation criteria set out in paragraphs 7 to 9 of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s 2nd Report, 2005 (Session 2): Report on the Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (SP Paper 434) and therefore agrees the recommendations in paragraph 19 of the report. Supported by: Nora Radcliffe*, John Scott*

The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-24 is:

S2M-3411 Mr Duncan McNeil on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload—That the Parliament endorses the prioritisation criteria set out in paragraphs 7 to 9 of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s 2nd Report, 2005 (Session 2): Report on the Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (SP Paper 434) and therefore agrees the recommendations in paragraph 19 of the report. Supported by: Nora Radcliffe, John Scott

The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-26 is:

S2M-3411 Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (lodged on 11 October 2005) Mr Andrew Welsh*

You can search for this motion (S2M-3411) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The third question is, that motion S2M-3411, in the name of Duncan McNeil, on a report on the prioritisation of NEBU's workload, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |