[S2M-3837.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2006 at 17:01

This looks like the vote on S2M-3837.3

The description in the bulletin on 2006-01-19 is:

*S2M-3837.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Air Route Development Fund—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3837) in the name of Tavish Scott, leave out from “endorses” to end and insert “questions the success of the Air Route Development Fund (ARDF) in bringing sustainable development benefits to Scotland; further questions whether economic advantages have flowed to the Scottish economy from the ARDF; supports the development of an international regime that reduces overall aviation emissions; notes that promoting expansion of aviation undermines existing emissions targets and that projected growth in aviation would necessitate cessation of economic activity in other sectors in order to achieve targets; notes that the net cost of aviation to the Scottish economy was £1.4 billion in 2004 and that the United Kingdom accounts for 87% of tourist visits to Scotland; supports work to improve rail journey times between Scotland and London in order to reduce the reliance on domestic short-haul flights but notes the lack of progress in this respect, and condemns the further use of public funds for the ARDF.” Supported by: Mark Ballard* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support

You can search for this motion (S2M-3837.3) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The third question is, that amendment S2M-3837.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3837, in the name of Tavish Scott, on the air route development fund, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |