[S2M-4370.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 May 2006 at 16:59
This looks like the vote on S2M-4370.3
The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-11 is:
*S2M-4370.3 Margo MacDonald: Drugs and Hidden Harm—As an amendment to motion (S2M-4370) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "; recognises" to end and insert "and to that end guarantees to investigate properly alternative regimes that aim to reduce the harm done by drug abuse and stabilise the lifestyle of persistent drug abusers; acknowledges the important role of kinship carers in helping to safeguard and nurture children who have been affected by substance misuse and recognises this role by financially recompensing them to an agreed national standard, and supports the Executive’s commitment to further improvements in the way that agencies protect and support children in these circumstances." Supported by: Campbell Martin*, Dennis Canavan*, Dr Jean Turner*, John Swinburne*
You can search for this motion (S2M-4370.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-4370.3, in the name of Margo MacDonald, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4370, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on drugs and hidden harm, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 102 | 13 | 0 | 89.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote