[S2M-5303.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Dec 2006 at 17:07
This looks like the vote on S2M-5303.3
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-13 is:
*S2M-5303.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Fisheries—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5303) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "and affirms that this outcome can best be achieved by shifting to long-term ecosystem-based management plans aimed towards achieving maximum sustainable yield, by making use of bycatch quotas and more technical measures in order to reduce discards and mortality in fisheries with high bycatch levels, by making innovative use of the European Fisheries Fund to support fishermen and associated communities and by supporting bottom-up approaches including the use of regional advisory councils, and urges the Executive to ensure that Scottish fishermen’s adaptability and sacrifices are not undermined by short-term pressures." Supported by: Eleanor Scott*
You can search for this motion (S2M-5303.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S2M-5303.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5303, in the name of Ross Finnie, on fisheries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 1 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 102 | 13 | 1 | 90.6% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote