[S2M-5608] Decision Time — 21 Feb 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5608
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-20 is:
*S2M-5608 Johann Lamont: Community Safety—That the Parliament acknowledges the good progress being made towards making our communities safer; notes that crime is falling and violent crime is at its lowest level since devolution; welcomes the record numbers of police officers now helping to prevent and detect crime; notes that antisocial behaviour legislation has made a real difference, with effective use being made by the police and local authorities of new measures contained in the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004; welcomes work by community safety partnerships to focus resources on tackling crime and disorder in response to local community needs, and supports the Scottish Executive’s determination to keep working with communities and to make further progress with its partners towards ensuring that decent and law-abiding people can feel safe in their homes and on their streets wherever they live. Supported by: Cathy Jamieson*
You can search for this motion (S2M-5608) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-5608, in the name of Johann Lamont, on community safety, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 88.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 67 | 43 | 7 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote