[S2M-5671] Decision Time — 8 Mar 2007 at 17:02

This looks like the vote on S2M-5671

The description in the bulletin on 2007-03-01 is:

*S2M-5671 Cathy Jamieson: Serious Crime Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament endorses the principle that the offence of breaching a Serious Crime Prevention Order should be extended to Scotland and that amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 relating to the use of force in executing search warrants in Scotland under section 387 of that Act and the extension of production orders and search warrants to include cash seizures as set out in the Serious Crime Bill, introduced in the House of Lords on 16 February 2007, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Johann Lamont*

The description in the bulletin on 2007-03-05 is:

S2M-5671 Cathy Jamieson: Serious Crime Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament endorses the principle that the offence of breaching a Serious Crime Prevention Order should be extended to Scotland and that amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 relating to the use of force in executing search warrants in Scotland under section 387 of that Act and the extension of production orders and search warrants to include cash seizures as set out in the Serious Crime Bill, introduced in the House of Lords on 16 February 2007, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Johann Lamont

You can search for this motion (S2M-5671) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The second question is, that motion S2M-5671, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on a legislative consent motion on the Serious Crime Bill, which is United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |