[S2M-5632] Decision Time — 15 Mar 2007 at 16:15
This looks like the vote on S2M-5632
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-22 is:
*S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont*
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-26 is:
S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
The description in the bulletin on 2007-03-12 is:
S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
You can search for this motion (S2M-5632) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are only two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-5632, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 4 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Independent | 2 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SG | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 22 | 0 | 0 | 88.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Total: | 89 | 23 | 3 | 89.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote