Voting Record — Ben Spencer MP, Runnymede and Weybridge (25889)
Ben Spencer is currently Member, Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Bill Committee, Member, Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Bill Committee and Member, Work and Pensions Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|13 Dec 2019||still in office||Con||5 votes out of 506, 1.0%||506 votes out of 569, 88.9%||1 time|
- See Ben Spencer's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Ben Spencer||Con Vote||Rôle|
|5 Jan 2022||Became Member, Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Bill Committee|
|Commons||14 Dec 2021||Public Health||minority||aye||Rebel|
|8 Dec 2021||Became Member, Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Bill Committee|
|Commons||3 Dec 2021||Prayers||tellaye||no||Rebel Teller|
|Commons||1 Dec 2020||Public Health||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||2 Sep 2020||Recall of MPs (Change of Party Affiliation) Bill — Expulsion from the House of Commons of MPs who Voluntarily Change Political Party||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||17 Jun 2020||Abortion (Northern Ireland) (No. 2) Regulations 2020||Majority||no||Rebel|
|2 Mar 2020||Became Member, Work and Pensions Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|