Voting Record — James Grundy MP, Leigh (25812)
James Grundy is currently Member, Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill Committee, Member, Dormant Assets Bill [HL] Committee, Member, Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill [HL] Committee, Member, Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill Committee and Member, European Statutory Instruments Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|13 Dec 2019||still in office||Con||3 votes out of 521, 0.6%||521 votes out of 566, 92.0%||0 times|
- See James Grundy's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||James Grundy||Con Vote||Rôle|
|2 Mar 2022||Became Member, Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill Committee|
|15 Dec 2021||Became Member, Dormant Assets Bill [HL] Committee|
|Commons||14 Dec 2021||Public Health||minority||aye||Rebel|
|1 Dec 2021||Became Member, Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill [HL] Committee|
|3 Nov 2021||Became Member, Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill Committee|
|Commons||27 Apr 2021||Delegated Legislation — Health and Personal Social Services||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||4 Nov 2020||Public Health||minority||aye||Rebel|
|14 Sep 2020||Became Member, European Statutory Instruments Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|