Voting Record — Kieran Mullan MP, Crewe and Nantwich (25883)
Kieran Mullan is currently Member, Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [HL] Committee, Member, Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Bill Committee and Member, Justice Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|13 Dec 2019||still in office||Con||3 votes out of 552, 0.5%||552 votes out of 603, 91.5%||0 times|
- See Kieran Mullan's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Kieran Mullan||Con Vote||Rôle|
|19 Jan 2022||Became Member, Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [HL] Committee|
|8 Dec 2021||Became Member, Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Bill Committee|
|Commons||27 Apr 2021||Delegated Legislation — Health and Personal Social Services||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||22 Mar 2021||Trade Bill — After Clause 2 - Trade agreements and genocide||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||9 Feb 2021||Trade Bill — After Clause 2 - Parliamentary approval of international trade agreements and treaties||minority||aye||Rebel|
|9 Mar 2020||Stopped being Member, Procedure Committee|
|2 Mar 2020||Became Member, Procedure Committee|
|2 Mar 2020||Became Member, Justice Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|