Voting Record — Kim Johnson MP, Liverpool, Riverside (25803)
Kim Johnson is currently Member, Skills and Post-16 Education [HL] Bill Committee, Member, Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill Committee, Member, Education (Careers Guidance in Schools) Bill Committee, Member, Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art, Member, Education Committee and Member, Women and Equalities Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|13 Dec 2019||still in office||Lab||1 vote out of 637, 0.2%||637 votes out of 887, 71.8%||0 times|
- See Kim Johnson's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Kim Johnson||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||14 Dec 2021||Draft Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) (No. 2) Regulations 2021||minority||aye||Rebel|
|24 Nov 2021||Became Member, Skills and Post-16 Education [HL] Bill Committee|
|3 Nov 2021||Became Member, Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill Committee|
|22 Sep 2021||Became Member, Education (Careers Guidance in Schools) Bill Committee|
|20 May 2020||Became Member, Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art|
|11 May 2020||Became Member, Education Committee|
|2 Mar 2020||Became Member, Women and Equalities Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|