Voting Record — Martin Whitfield MP, East Lothian (25651)
Martin Whitfield is currently Member, High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill Select Committee (Commons) and Member, Science and Technology Committee (Commons)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|9 Jun 2017||still in office||Lab||2 votes out of 353, 0.6%||353 votes out of 445, 79.3%||5 times|
- See Martin Whitfield's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Martin Whitfield||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||12 Dec 2018||Establishment of an International Trade and Development Agency||tellno||no||Teller|
|Commons||28 Mar 2018||Police Officer Numbers||tellno||aye||Rebel Teller|
|Commons||28 Mar 2018||Local Government Funding||tellno||aye||Rebel Teller|
|5 Feb 2018||Became Member, High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill Select Committee (Commons)|
|Commons||17 Jan 2018||European Union (Withdrawal) Bill — New Clause 17 — Report on Economic Impact of Withdrawal Agreement||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|Commons||20 Nov 2017||Budget Resolution — Customs Duties — Goods from the European Union||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|11 Sep 2017||Became Member, Science and Technology Committee (Commons)|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|