Health Bill — New Clause 5 — Smoke-free premises: exemptions — as amended — 14 Feb 2006 at 19:04
Those voting Aye agreed that the proposed New Clause (first on the page) as amended (by the removal of part 2(b)) should be inserted into the Health Bill.
See the previous vote, Division 163, for further information.
This New Clause outlined circumstances where the "appropriate national authority" (eg local government) could create regulated exceptions to the smoke-free law for "any premises where a person has his home, or is living whether permanently or temporarily (including hotels, care homes, and prisons and other places where a person may be detained)"
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 55 | 100 | 0 | 79.1% |
| DUP | 8 | 0 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Lab | 295 (+2 tell) | 25 (+2 tell) | 0 | 91.8% |
| LDem | 49 | 3 | 0 | 82.5% |
| PC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SDLP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 413 | 129 | 0 | 86.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote