Voting Record — Mike Hill MP, Hartlepool (25619)
Mike Hill is currently Member, Petitions Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|9 Jun 2017||still in office||Lab||4 votes out of 365, 1.1%||365 votes out of 445, 82.0%||0 times|
- See Mike Hill's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
- Search for local party donations declared to the Electoral Commission
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Mike Hill||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||1 Apr 2019||EU Withdrawal and Future Relationship — Motion (E) Confirmatory Public Vote on Withdrawal Agreement and Framework for Future Relationship||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||1 Apr 2019||EU Withdrawal and Future Relationship — Motion (D) Common Market 2.0 — Retain Relatively Free Movement of People and Goods via European Free Trade Association Membership — External Tarriff Alignment with the EU||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||27 Mar 2019||EU Withdrawal and Future Relationship Votes — Motion (M) — Public Vote on Withdrawal Agreement and Framework for Future Relationship with the EU||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Jun 2018||European Union (Withdrawal) Bill — Seek Participation in European Economic Area via EU Withdrawal Agreement Negotiations||Majority||no||Rebel|
|11 Sep 2017||Became Member, Petitions Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|