Hunting Bill: amendment — hare coursing — 28 Oct 2003 at 19:49
A vote on whether to support Clause 5 of the Hunting Bill, which contained a ban on hare coursing from the Hunting Bill, or to allow for (permitted) "registered" coursing.
Those voting content were voting to retain the ban; those voting non-content supported registered hare coursing.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 59; Not-Contents, 129.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.2% |
| Con | 84 (+2 tell) | 2 | 41.1% |
| Crossbench | 26 | 2 | 16.4% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 8 | 42 (+2 tell) | 27.1% |
| LDem | 6 | 10 | 25.0% |
| Total: | 126 | 56 | 27.9% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.