Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 9 Dec 2014 at 18:35
Motion B
Moved by Lord Faulks
That this House do not insist on its Amendments 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 102, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 102A.
Lords Amendments
97: Clause 64, page 64, line 35, leave out “must” and insert “may”
98: Clause 64, page 64, line 37, leave out “not” and insert “decline to”
99: Clause 64, page 65, line 10, leave out “must” and insert “may”
100: Clause 64, page 65, line 13, leave out “must” and insert “may”
101: Clause 64, page 65, line 33, leave out “must” and insert “may”
102: Clause 64, page 65, line 40, leave out “must” and insert “may”
Commons Reason
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 102 for the following reason-
102A: Because it is appropriate to impose duties, rather than to confer discretions, on the High Court and the Upper Tribunal in connection with judicial review proceedings in which it is highly likely that the outcome for the applicant would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 3 | 0 | 13.0% |
| Con | 9 | 148 (+1 tell) | 66.7% |
| Crossbench | 50 (+1 tell) | 5 | 29.8% |
| DUP | 0 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 4 (+1 tell) | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 165 | 0 | 73.3% |
| LDem | 24 | 47 (+1 tell) | 66.7% |
| Non-affiliated | 1 | 0 | 3.2% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| UUP | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 260 | 202 | 55.7% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.