Hunting with dogs: Ban — 19 Mar 2002 at 18:04
a free "indicative" vote to guide the Government on how to deal with the issue of hunting with dogs. Those voting "content" in this division were supporting a ban on hunting with dogs - in accordance with provision similar to Schedule 3 to the Hunting Bill as introduced in the Commons in Session 2000–01 [Bill 2].
Other votes covered the options of self-regulation of hunting and a licensing scheme. The House of Commons had held its own "indicative" votes the previous day.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 74; Not-Contents, 331.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||169 (+1 tell)||1||77.4%|
|Lab||43 (+1 tell)||60 (+1 tell)||54.1%|
|LDem||31||7 (+1 tell)||59.1%|
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.