Judicial Review and Courts Bill — Report — Amendment 4 — 31 Mar 2022 at 14:28
Moved by Lord Etherton
4: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 24 to 32Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the presumption that where a suspended or prospective-only quashing order would offer adequate redress, such a quashing order should be made in preference to an ordinary quashing order.
Ayes 159, Noes 134.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 126 | 47.2% |
| Crossbench | 23 | 2 | 14.0% |
| DUP | 0 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 2 | 1 | 27.3% |
| Lab | 75 | 0 | 42.6% |
| LDem | 51 | 0 | 60.7% |
| Non-affiliated | 5 | 3 | 14.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 159 | 134 | 37.4% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.